Pakatan should stop depending on BN to take down BN


CONFUSION IN PAKATAN: There has been a lot of talk about how Barisan Nasional is weak but a weaker Opposition meant that this weakness could not be taken advantage of.

The question is - Is BN really weak?

BN representatives – despite all kinds of rumours – have remained steadfast with their chosen leader Najib Razak.

Indeed, when the prime minister was confronted by all the other BN component parties over the red shirt rally with all other component parties voting to stop that rally, Najib could still walk out of that meeting and announce to the world that they agreed to disagree with not a single coalition partner leader uttering a squeak after that.

When Dr Mahathir Mohamed and Muhyiddin Yassin attempted to break ranks, they were systematically shut down and shunned by BN. All in their camp were completely decimated and ostracised politically thereafter.

Meanwhile, the Opposition came in different packaging with confusing labels on what they actually stand for.

Pakatan Harapan exists in Penang but not in Selangor or Kelantan. Pakatan Rakyat supposedly still exists in Selangor while there is only PAS in Kelantan. In the states of Johor and Sarawak, the local chapters of PKR, DAP and PAS have been reported to be squabbling among themselves.

Pakatan Harapan was launched without a constitution or even an anointed leader. Even Pakatan Rakyat did not have a constitution, only a common policy framework, and we all know how well that worked out in the end.

It gets even more confusing when you try to spell out the varying relationships among the so-called partners:

  • According to DAP, PAS is a traitor but they can still work with PKR, except that there appears to be elements of treachery when Penang PKR reps abstained from voting in support of the Penang government.


  • According to PAS, DAP is a traitor but they can still work with PKR.


  • According to PKR, they can work with PAS and DAP even if the other two cannot work with each other.

This confusing relationship has made it impossible for them to be a cohesive voting bloc and their differences often lead to confrontations and accusations against each other.

In TERMS of political strategies, all the major plans for change by Pakatan backfire because they stupidly injected into their plans a fatal flaw – the need for BN dissidents to support those plans.

We had the so-called September 16 crossover from BN in 2008 that never materialised as a lesson. We had the crossover of an Umno assemblyperson in Perak that led to the collapse of the Perak government as a lesson. And now we have a vote of no confidence against Najib that failed which can be added to the list of lessons Pakatan needs to learn.

Pakatan should stop depending on BN to take down BN. When you need someone and they do not need you in return, you are just asking to be used and abused.-The Ant Daily

Post a Comment

Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *

Powered by Blogger.
Javascript DisablePlease Enable Javascript To See All Widget